TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Abbreviation of measures From:"Ridder, Fred" <F -dot- Ridder -at- DIALOGIC -dot- COM> Date:Sat, 7 Jun 1997 13:36:19 -0400
Well, I don't know if it's the _official_ reason for capping the "G",
but
one common rationale is that in the binary world "Giga" is the prefix
for 2^30=1,073,741,824, while the scientific "giga" is the prefix for
10^9=1,000,000,000. This same rationale/distinction applies to
the use of "Kilo" or "K" for 2^10=1024 in relation to computers vs.
the scientific "kilo", which indicates 10^3=1000. "M" for "mega",
though, is inherently ambiguous without knowing the specific
context; it could stand for either the computer (binary) mega or
the scientific (decimal) mega.
And Rikki shouldn't be so concerned about capital letters in
abbreviations
for units of measure because there are lots of precedents:
A=ampere (electrical current, named after Andre-Marie Ampere)
MHz=megahertz (frequency, after Heinrich Hertz)
MW=megawatt (power, after James Watt)
pF=picofarad (capacitance, after Michael Faraday)
dB=decibel (loudness, after Alexander Graham Bell)
°C=degrees Celsius (temperature, after Anders Celsius)
K=kelvins (degrees above absolute zero, after Lord Kelvin)
VU=volume units (used on recording level meters)
Tbsp=tablespoon (capped for more differentiation from "tsp")
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jeanette Feldhousen [SMTP:jeanette_feldhousen -at- MENTORG -dot- COM]
>Sent: Friday, June 06, 1997 12:25 PM
>Subject: Re: Abbreviation of measures
>
>On Jun 6, 8:45am, Mitman, Rikki wrote:
>> Subject: Abbreviation of measures
>> I'm looking for consensus on the abbreviation of things like megabyte
>> and gigabyte, which are typically represented as mb and gb (or, to my
>> dismay, MB, Mb GB, and Gb). To me, these are abbreviations, *not*
>> acronyms, and should not be capped.
>
>In scientific circles, "M" means mega, while "m" means milli, so the capital
>M is correct. Unfortunately I don't have the reference here, so I can't
>give you an answer on giga.
>
>--Jeanette
>
>--
>Jeanette Feldhousen jeanette_feldhousen -at- mentorg -dot- com
>Mentor Graphics Corporation
>8005 SW Boeckman Road, Wilsonville, OR 97070
>
TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html