TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: why bytes are Bs and not bs From:"Ridder, Fred" <F -dot- Ridder -at- DIALOGIC -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 11 Jun 1997 09:59:58 -0400
Not quite right, Peter.
The underlying prefixes and abbreviations for orders of magnitude are
part of the International Scientific Vocabulary (ISV). The metric
system
uses some, but not all, of the ISV prefixes because it is also based on
powers of ten. As an example of the partial use of the ISV in the
metric
system, consider the fact that 1 million grams is always referred to as
1000 kilograms and not as "1 megagram".
But one real important point that many posters on this thread seem
to be overlooking is that "kilo", "mega", and "giga" (and "tera", which
is the next multiple up from "giga") as used in relation to computers
are *not the same thing* as the scientific prefixes. The scientific
prefixes refer to powers of 10^3 (1000), while the computer prefixes
refer to powers of 2^10 (1024). The actual magnitudes represented
by the computer prefixes are *close to* those of the scientific prefixes
(2.4% difference for "kilo", but compounding for larger multipliers),
but they are emphatically *not* identical.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Peter Brown [SMTP:pbrown -at- MKS -dot- COM]
>Sent: Monday, June 09, 1997 10:50 AM
>Subject: Re: why bytes are Bs and not bs
>
>Miss Julie A Landry wrote:
>> If they are true abbreviations, why don't you end them with periods?
>> Okay, okay, I get the gist of the question. If a centimeter is cm, why
>> isn't megabyte always mb? I dunno, but most places I've worked preferred
>> MB. (It was listed that way in the IBM dictionary of computer terms, too.)
>
>It's called the metric system, which is the standard used in the
>scientific community, and therefore the computer scientific community.
>'m' means 'milli', and 'M' means 'mega'.
>
>--
>---------------------------------------------------------------
>"Opinions? I've had a few. But then again, too few to mention."
>Peter Brown, Technical Writer (pbrown -at- mks -dot- com)
>Mortice Kern Systems Inc. (http://www.mks.com)
>
TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html