Re: FrameMaker vs PageMaker

Subject: Re: FrameMaker vs PageMaker
From: Jane Bergen <janeber -at- CYBERRAMP -dot- NET>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 1997 20:38:03 +0600

On 11 Jun 97, E,T, Hull wrote:

> I am looking for a program which is suited for writing and layout of
> technical manuals of about 150 pages. They will include a lot of
> tables and some figures. I have heard that both PageMaker and
> FrameMaker are good for this. My questions: What are the major
> differences between them? Advantages and disadvantages? Is import of
> old manuals from Word Perfect and Word possible? Which do you
> prefer?

Just remember that FrameMaker does NOT SORT TABLES! I'm screaming
this because it's been my pet peeve for a couple of years (among
other quirks). Pagemaker, with it's stone-age table editor, does not
appear to sort them either. At least in my PageMaker 6.5 manual, the
index has no entry for sorting tables. But I think I expect it less
in PM than FM, just because FM positions itself as the all-to-end-all
for tech writers.

Venting...

Jane
Jane Bergen, Technical Writer
AnswerSoft, Inc. - Dallas, TX

janeber -at- cyberramp -dot- net

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: Frame 4 vs. Frame 5
Next by Author: Re: Jewelbox booklets?
Previous by Thread: Re: Pagemaker Tables
Next by Thread: FrameMaker vs PageMaker


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads