Re: are tw-interviewers incompetent by definition?

Subject: Re: are tw-interviewers incompetent by definition?
From: John Glenn <sfarmh1 -at- SCFN -dot- THPL -dot- LIB -dot- FL -dot- US>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 05:14:27 -0400

FWIW, the consulting company for which I labor -- I won't
mention Trecom's name -- makes certain that all TW
candidates are ''teched'' by the resident writer (this
scrivener); occasionally a person applying for a
''communications sensitive job'' (i.e. where the candidate
REALLY must have ''communications skills'' and not just the
phrase on a resume) I am asked to review the resume/cover
letter and to spend some time talking to the candidate.
For the most part, the company takes tech interviews very
seriously and attempts to have these undertaken by a person
(or persons) with the relevant skill set(s). An hour phone
interview is NOT uncommon, although it IS hard on the ears.

JOhn Glenn <sfarmh1 -at- scfn -dot- thpl -dot- lib -dot- fl -dot- us>
mailto:sfarmh1 -at- scfn -dot- thpl -dot- lib -dot- fl -dot- us
====================================================
...do not make a statement that cannot be easily
understood on the grounds that it will be understood
eventually. [Hillel - Avot 2:5]

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: slashes, UNIX, and Windows
Next by Author: Re: newbie needs advice
Previous by Thread: Re: are tw-interviewers incompetent by definition?
Next by Thread: Re: are tw-interviewers incompetent by definition?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads