TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
I disagree with you when you say that working on long-distance contracts is
equivalent to doings things "barely right". Granted, some projects do not
lend themselves well to not being on-site, but others are perfectly suited.
I have worked (on a contract basis) on some projects where it only made
sense to do most of my work on-site. I wasn't given any specifications, no
screens were available for me to start my work (user documentation), and I
had to start by interviewing SMEs about the product. So, obviously, I was at
my client's site most of the time. I would have insisted in doing so myself,
and I would have refused the job if I hadn't been able to be on-site at
least a good deal of the time.
However, many other projects can easily be VERY PROFESSIONALLY done from a
distance. I am currently working on a large technical translation project
(screens, menus, commands, error messages, forms, Online Help system, User
Guide) with another US city, and I really don't need to be on-site for this.
I suggested to my client, and they immediately agreed with me, that I should
come and see them at the beginning of the project to get to know the people
and to start working using their software, templates and working methods. So
I spent a week on-site in Atlanta to get the project going. Now, I'm back
home to complete the 3-4 month project. Everything is running smoothly. We
are in daily contact through e-mail, fax, and telephone. My client is very
pleased with the way things are going, and I am meeting all expected
deadlines. Never once was I told that it would have been better if I were
on-site for the whole project.
So, although I agree that for certain specific projects, it is better to
work on-site, I totally disagree with John Posada that for projects that
lend themselves to distance contracts, the quality would be "barely right".
If you are a professional, you will provide professional work and
professional service. I never settle for "barely right". And I never get
completely paid until my client is COMPLETELY satisfied, not just after I
send them the last files.
Also, long-distance contracts may not even slow down a project (no
commuting, no chatting at the office, etc.), particularly in the case of a
well-planned project where there are no "cut-throat" deadlines.
Fabien Vais
phantoms -at- accent -dot- net
At 01:00 PM 6/16/97 -0400, you wrote:
>>> RE: Fabien says he can do work for a client around the world just as well as
>for a client down the street.
>
>
>Fabien...I hate to say this, but no, you can't. Maybe you can do work from a
>distance, but you (or anyone, nothing personal) cannot handle contracts "just
>as easily" as you can in person.
>
>I also have a "darn good" settup at home...desktop and portable Pentiums,
>modem, ISDN, groupware (Lotus Notes), all the software you can possibly think
>of, teleconferencing with video capabilty, etc. However, what I (or you) don't
>have from off-site is the ability to grab 2 or 3 associates, drag them to an
>empty conference room, and take care of a
>problem/issue/situation/assignment/etc., immediately.
>
>There is a difference between working at home a couple of days a week from a
>home office and being in one country and working for a company in another
>country.
>
>I have writers come to me proposing that I use them for either long-term or
>permanent positions and they tell me the same thing...that they can handle the
>assignment just as well as sonmeone who can show up at the spur of the moment
>When I start asking them how they will handle certain situations, they realize
>that there isd a difference between doing something "barely right", and doing
>it well. I can't use "barely right". I need the best I can get when I need
>it.
>
>John Posada
>Tactical Applications Group
>Ernst & Young
>john -dot- posada -at- ey -dot- com
>
> TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
>to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
> to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
> Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
>browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html
>
>
TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html