TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Newsletters vs. techwr-l From:geoff-h -at- MTL -dot- FERIC -dot- CA Date:Thu, 26 Jun 1997 09:41:07 -0500
Matt Danda wondered if it was worthwhile repeating
information already discussed on the list in the form of a
newsletter article. In a word, "yes". In several words: "I
just did it recently for Intercom", and have had some
positive feedback from readers.
Matt gave the example of STC newsletters. Don't forget,
Matt, that STC has some 20 000 members, and techwr-l only
has ca. 2000-3000, many of whom are not STC members. So
there's some overlap, but there's also an audience of
around (say) 18 000 people who aren't on techwr-l. In
addition, a newsletter article worth writing will
_summarize_ the techwr-l thread in a logical form, with
introduction, results, and conclusions; our unedited
discussions, while fascinating, would make for utterly
incompetent newsletter articles because they're
disorganized (comments arrive out of temporal or logical
sequence), include tons of redundant requotes so that
nobody forgets the thread, and are often full of typos.
One note: If you do summarize something into an article, it
would be polite to at least acknowledge the people who
provided the information. Although you don't strictly
speaking need someone's permission to quote them, ideally,
you should get their permission to acknowledge them at the
end of the article; not everyone will want to be associated
with your article, particularly if it's on a subject as
controversial as education and productivity.
--Geoff Hart @8^{)} geoff-h -at- mtl -dot- feric -dot- ca
Disclaimer: Speaking for myself, not FERIC.
TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html