TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Spacing after a period... From:Mc Jdub <wigginje -at- PSSCH -dot- PS -dot- GE -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 2 Jul 1997 11:18:29 -0400
My understanding is that two spaces after a period is incorrect when the
text is justified. Otherwise, it is a matter of one's preference and
sense of aesthetics (or not) -- though I believe the trend is toward
using one space.
Now, what's the rule for spaces before and after an em dash?
> ----------
> From: Phillip Winn[SMTP:pwinn -at- S7 -dot- COM]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 1997 9:49 AM
> To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
> Subject: Re: Spacing after a period...
>
> >> Which is correct? One space after a period or two spaces after a
> period
> >> before starting the next sentence.
> >>
> >> Since I've been exposed to DTP, I've been using a single space.
> I've
> >> recently come in contact with writers that still use two spaces.
> >>
> >> What are the rules if there are any? Does it depend on proportional
> vs.
> >> non-proportional fonts?
> >
> >I think you will find that this is the old way of typing, it was two
> spaces
> >after a period and one after a comma.
> >
> >But hardly anyone does this anymore.
>
> Umm, perhaps I'm being obtuse, but I don't believe the questions was
> "What
> do people do?" or "Why?" but rather "Which is correct?" It is quite
> common
> for authors using DTP to use only one space to differentiate
> sentences, but
> in doing so, these authors lose sight of why two spaces were used to
> begin
> with. In the early days of word-wrapping word processors, most
> programs
> were not equipped to deal with multiple spaces to delineate sentences.
> The
> first space would cause wrapped line, and then the second space would
> end
> up looking like an indent. Hardly the effect people wanted to
> achieve.
>
> It is still quite correct and proper to use two space, and I don't
> just say
> that because I want to live in the past. I'm 25, so I'm not an
> old-fashioned person normally. Look at my first sentence. It ends
> with a
> quotation mark. The two spaces following that mark make it clear that
> I am
> beginning a new sentence, a fact that might not otherwise have been
> perfectly clear. Even in cases of unambiguous punctuation, two space
> provide space that seems to relax the eyes of the reader. With only
> one
> space, the sentences tend to run together.
>
> Try this experiment: Write a page both ways. Hold them each at arms
> length
> at take a look at them. Which looks more comfortable to read? Take a
> look
> at any recent bestseller. I guarantee you that they are not still
> using
> manual printing presses, but book publishers still generally (with
> exceptions) use two spaces. Actually, book publishers tend to use
> about
> 1.5 spaces, but we can't all do that. All of the rules in the world
> don't
> mean a thing if you don't like the results, but I definitely vote for
> keeping the useful and helpful tradition alive.
>
> Sorry so long. One of my many pet peeves.
>
> |- Phillip Winn -|- Strategy 7 -|- vox 972.458.2817 -|
> |- pwinn -at- s7 -dot- com -|- Dallas, TX -|- fax 972.458.2218 -|
>
> ~~
> TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a
> message
> to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send
> commands
> to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
> Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
> browse the archives at
>http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html
> Send list questions or problems to the listowner at
>
TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html