Re: Scientific vs. Humanistic

Subject: Re: Scientific vs. Humanistic
From: "Williams, Diane (contractor)" <Williams_Diane -at- DOTE -dot- OSD -dot- MIL>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 1997 11:47:40 -0400

>>Murrie Burgan said: Since the % symbol is a commonly used symbol and likely
to be recognized by the audience for the report, I see no reason why
you can't use it
instead of spelling out percent.
<<

Me too! I'm using the % symbol. There are too many occurances of
"percent" to spell it out, and this doc is certainly NOT "humanistic"
IMHO. The person who was looking it over kept making notes to herself
about consulting the Gregg manual. I don't use Gregg, but I bet it would
concur that % is okay to use in this case.

Thanks for everyone's replies!

Diane

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Scientific vs. Humanistic
Next by Author: Re: Headers & footers - what to put in them?
Previous by Thread: Scientific vs. Humanistic
Next by Thread: Re: Scientific vs. Humanistic


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads