Re[2]: Speaking of Improper Terminology

Subject: Re[2]: Speaking of Improper Terminology
From: Scott Miller <scott_miller -at- CCMAIL -dot- COM>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 13:43:58 -0800

Dictionary definitions are not the point. "Master/slave" has obvious negative
connotations, and I wouldn't use it no matter how correct it is. Same for
"abort."

- Scott_Miller -at- ccmail -dot- com

>Referring to the question of "master" and "slave" are inappropriate terms,
>Don Timmerman wrote:

>Why? The use of master and slave as quoted below fits the definitions
>provided by my 1993 Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, tenth
>edition.

>Could you expand ever so slightly, Don? Quote the relevant part of the
>definition, perhaps

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: Style, format etc
Next by Author: Re[2]: Re[2]: Speaking of Improper Terminology
Previous by Thread: Re: Speaking of Improper Terminology
Next by Thread: Re: Speaking of Improper Terminology


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads