Re: Improper Terminology

Subject: Re: Improper Terminology
From: Hal Wrobel <halw -at- NETVISION -dot- NET -dot- IL>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 23:29:51 +0200

Given the understandable sensitivity to the master/slave analogy,
perhaps primary/secondary would be more appropriate.

Hal Wrobel
halw -at- netvision -dot- net -dot- il

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: writing for non-native speakers of English
Next by Author: Incorporating online help w/training
Previous by Thread: Re: Re[2]: Master/Slave
Next by Thread: Re: Improper Terminology


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads