TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:ADMIN: No changes to Usenet From:"Eric J. Ray" <ejray -at- RAYCOMM -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 22 Oct 1997 21:17:08 -0600
Gang,
The votes _FOR_ keeping the Usenet echo are overwhelming.
In addition to the individuals who rely on Usenet for a
variety of reasons, a couple of other good points weighed
heavily in favor of keeping the echo.
A sample:
>I do use Usenet to read techwr-l occasionally and find it very handy,
>more so than the Web archives. I also wanted to point out that unless
>it is the *only* group someone responds to on Usenet, they're still
>going to have a problem with spam.
And another:
>About address culling by junk mailers, I get a few pieces but nothing out
>of hand. Dropping the techwr-l Usenet echo would eliminate one possible
>source of address culling for list members, but how many other sources
>would still be intact? Would all members be willing to swear off using all
>Usenet groups?
To give an additional example, a reader was complaining of
spam and said that they thought that TECHWR-L was the only
possible source. A Web search and Usenet search on AltaVista
turned up several other avenues from which their address could
have been culled.
Thus, although there's a distinct possibility that spammers
harvest addresses from the Usenet echo, the benefits of
keeping it far outweigh the risks. I suppose that, if you
currently get NO spam, there might be a benefit to not
posting so your address couldn't be harvested. However, if
you've ever posted anything anywhere, the damage is likely
done.
Please don't respond online--ask me personally if you have
questions.
Thanks!
Eric
**************************************************
Eric J. Ray ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com
TECHWR-L Listowner http://www.raycomm.com/