TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Hit Man Manual From:"Tamminga, Ernie" <et -at- DSC -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 12 Nov 1997 09:59:01 -0800
At a seminar/retreat a couple of years ago, I remember talking with a
woman who was a superior court judge. She had just completed a trial
involving someone who had committed a murder. The murderer had used a
book that explained how to make someone's death as prolonged and painful
as possible. And he had followed the directions. Successfully.
I can still recall this woman's emotional state, after she had to
preside over such a case.
There is no comparison between writing evil (I use that word carefully)
excrement like that, and writing warning labels.
--------
Ernie Tamminga
Director, InfoEngineering
Digital Sound Corporation
-----------------------------------------------
Opinions expressed are my own, and not necessarily those of Digital
Sound Corporation
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Tracy Boyington [SMTP:tracy_boyington -at- OKVOTECH -dot- ORG]
>Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 1997 9:16 AM
>To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
>Subject: Re: Hit Man Manual
>
>Tim Altom wrote:
>
>> I know that over the years I've had to put in safety messages that could,
>>if
>> taken out of context by an unscrupulous rogue, be used as a recipe for
>> destruction. For example, saying "Mixing these two chemicals could result
>>in
>> an explosion, toxic gas, and attendant death of bystanders" is just another
>> way of telling a would-be terrorist "Mix these, stand well back, and enjoy
>> the fun". Almost any warning about poisons, toxins, radiation, or
>>biohazards
>> could be used this way. And it would be almost impossible to skirt the
>> subject without eliminating all the warning benefits, too.
>
>I guess all we can do is hope intent counts for something. Surely "don't
>do this or you'll get hurt" won't be treated the same as "here is the
>best way to blow up a building." I hope...
>
>Tracy
>--
>==============================================
>Tracy Boyington tracy_boyington -at- okvotech -dot- org
>Oklahoma Department of Vocational and Technical Education
>Stillwater, OK, USA
>http://www.okvotech.org/cimc/home.htm
>!!! Nov. 8, 1997: OSU 30, OU 7 !!!
>==============================================
>
>Posts: mailto:techwr-l -at- listserv -dot- okstate -dot- edu
>Commands: mailto:listserv -at- listserv -dot- okstate -dot- edu (e.g. SIGNOFF TECHWR-L)
>Archives: http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html,
>Subjects: JOB:, QUESTION:, SUMMARY:, ANNOUNCE:, or none of these.
>
>