Re: hitman manual

Subject: Re: hitman manual
From: "Wittel, Teresa" <Twittel -at- NCSLINK -dot- COM>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 1997 17:00:52 -0700

Although common sense tells you this would never be a problem in a
rational legal system, Tim brings up a few thought-provoking points.

I wonder if you could provide a reasonable defense by demonstating that
the US military has been inserting potentially dangerous warnings and
cautions since the beginning of tech writing. The US military
represents a substantive authority for "proper" tech writing. I'd think
the court would have a hard time saying you were writing something for
which you could be held liable for injuries resulting from deliberate
misuse. Especially on a "he should have known" basis.

Boy, didn't THAT sound confusing....


Teresa Wittel
NCS Sr. Information Developer
Mailto: WITTTE -at- ncslink -dot- com


Posts: mailto:techwr-l -at- listserv -dot- okstate -dot- edu
Commands: mailto:listserv -at- listserv -dot- okstate -dot- edu (e.g. SIGNOFF TECHWR-L)
Archives: http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html,
http://www.documentation.com/, or http://www.dejanews.com/
Subjects: JOB:, QUESTION:, SUMMARY:, ANNOUNCE:, or none of these.


Previous by Author: Re: online wording question
Next by Author: FW: online wording question
Previous by Thread: Liability for manuals?
Next by Thread: Re: hitman manual


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads