TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Numbered list vs bulleted list From:"Cramer, Kim" <kcramer -at- NCSLINK -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 19 Nov 1997 07:46:00 -0700
From: Don Timmerman
> The editor had to leave the project for several days (business trip)
> and I am filling in because of the project deadline. I contend that
> any list of action steps be numbered if those steps must be performed
> sequentially. The DOE Standard Writer's Guide for Technical
> Procedures states the following, "Action step numbering identifies
> individual action steps and their sequence."
If a user could have problems if he or she failed to perform the steps
in order, then I would number them to indicate the appropriate order.
Saying that bullets are OK just because some other software docs use
them isn't a good reason to use them yourself for procedural steps. Why
don't you conduct a brief user survey and find out if bullets would be
misunderstood by your audience?
*************
Kim Cramer mailto:kcramer -at- ncslink -dot- com
Sr. Information Developer
NCS Education, Mesa AZ
*************