TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Numbered list vs bulleted list From:Wendy Putman <wputman -at- CASTLETON -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 19 Nov 1997 08:47:29 -0800
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Don Timmerman [SMTP:timmerma -at- IPDLINK -dot- IPD -dot- ANL -dot- GOV]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 1997 6:34 AM
> To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
> Subject: Numbered list vs bulleted list
>
> Hi all,
>
>I've just returned from the archive with very little success.
Here's
>the scenario.
>The author (programmer) wrote a software installation and user
guide
>for a DOS program (not a commercial software). Action steps
are in
>bullet lists; each bullet has been replaced with a graphic
pointing
>hand (side view).
Personal feedback has been that graphic bullets fall into the
"cute" category. According to visual communication theory (William
Horton), there is not a single hand gesture that isn't offensive to at
least one culture. In other words, hand gestures are NOT safe to use in
documentation that's going to be used by a poly-ethnic audience.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Wendy Putman, Technical Writer
Castleton Network Systems, Burnaby, BC