TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: ISO 9000 Quality From:Michael Lewis <lewism -at- BRANDLE -dot- COM -dot- AU> Date:Thu, 27 Nov 1997 14:57:21 +1100
Steven Jong wrote:
> ... There is a process in
> ISO whereby customer complaints and employee suggestions are handled and
> implemented. Then the consistency becomes important, for what good is an idea
> if it's not fully adopted? Over time, any organization following the full ISO
> precepts cannot help but improve the quality of its output. It's a two-step
> process. First, do consistent work; then, improve it.
Yebbut:
In Deming's work, the fact remains that "quality" doesn't mean "how good
the thing is" (as in "A Cadillac is of higher quality than a Pinto"). It
means "whether the thing matches what we set out to produce". This
includes cost constraints. Sure, customers will always want the Caddy at
Pinto prices; they can't have it. And ISO 9000 has nothing to do with
trying to give it to them: anyone trying to produce a Pinto-priced
product with Caddy-level quality will go to the wall sooner rather than
later. ISO9000 just means that every Pinto has the same (if you like,
"optimal") amount of Pinto-ness.
--
Michael Lewis
Brandle Pty Limited, Sydney, Australia
PO Box 1249, Strawberry Hills, NSW 2012
Tel +61-2-9310-2224 ... Fax +61-2-9310-5056