TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: FrontPage 98 Beta Frustrations From:"Susan W. Gallagher" <sgallagher -at- EXPERSOFT -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 2 Dec 1997 14:02:06 -0800
At 04:46 PM 12/2/97 -0500, John Posada wrote:
>Hey, guys...a simple question (expressed emotionally) about how do you
insert code that isn't changed in FrontPage (which you can and I addressed
how) has turned into Holy War 3... WYSIWYG vs Hand Coding.
Nowaitaminit, there, John. Not a holy war on my end. Just a plain
statement of fact. WYSIWYG HTML editors add stuff you may not want.
>
>Where I come from, a client is interested in one thing...getting a good
(in the customer's eyes) quality product up/out/etc as quickly as possible.
Yeah. OK. Where I come from, too. However...
When I have nested lists and unnumbered paragraphs in between list
items and I need steps numbered consecutively and the editor inserts
start and end list tags where I don't want them and step 7 turns into
a new step 1 and step 8 turns into a new step 1, then the editor isn't
my helper, it's a problem.
When I have font size changes in mid-word to simulate small caps
and the editor automatically inserts spaces between the font tags
so that I end up with spaces in the middle of words, then the
editor isn't my helper, it's a problem.
WYSIWIG HTML editors have done both of these things to me. That's
why I don't use them.
>Maybe there are some html coders that object more to the fact that what
took them >1-2 years to learn code can now be done by someone with less
training than that.
Well, if it takes anybody longer than a month to become productive with
HTML, they probably need a dedicated editor. ;-) And I certainly don't
have a problem with anyone who likes and uses one. I'm just not sure
why you have a problem that I don't use one.