TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Tutorials From:Scott Gray <scotty -at- CM -dot- MATH -dot- UIUC -dot- EDU> Date:Wed, 10 Dec 1997 00:40:30 -0600
Thank you Smokey. Since I've started writting materials outside of
Mathematics I've found that while I consider myself good at writing
and designing training materials for the web, I am rather illiterate
in the language and concepts that have been used in the educational
realm for years.
"I hear and I forget, I see and I forget, I do and I forget" -- confused.
On Tue, 9 Dec 1997, Smokey Lynne L Bare wrote:
> ....for your consideration...
>
> Cognitive Domain is a process, which is composed of phases, steps, or
> levels (whichever you prefer), that is composed of two parts for each
> level. Those two parts are criteria (General Instructional Descriptors),
> and terminology (Terms for Stating Specific Learning Outcomes).
>
> Since you are in the mathematics arena, let me provide an example: (think
> of it as a three-column table) [Please bare with me - pardon the pun, if
> it does not line up in your E-mail as well as it does in mine.]
>
>
>
> Level Gen. Instruct. Descr.
> Terms for Stat. Spec. Learn. Out.
> *****************************************************************************************************
>
> (second level)
>
> Comprehension Understands facts & principles
> converts, defends,
> Interprets verbal material distinguishes,
> estimates,
> Interprets charts & graphs explains,
> extends, infers,
> Translates verbal material to
> generalizes, gives examples,
> mathematical formulas paraphrases,
> predicts,
> Estimates future consequences rewrites,
> summarizes
> implied in data
> Justifies methods & procedures
>
>
> Each of the other levels, listed in my original reply to you, has the
> same format with their own information in the two columns. I,
> personally, use synthesis the most. It has 'integrates learning from
> different areas into a plan for solving a problem', along with
> 'formulates a new scheme for classifying objects (or events, or ideas)'.
> When you work with reengineering, or HELP systems, this aids a TC (Tech.
> Comm.) when storyboarding the links.
>
> Originally used by textbook publishers (my background for awhile), it has
> branched into online design work to minimize the reading work load each
> of us has every day. The best word to describe it is 'specificity'. I
> let the SMEs (subject matter experts) own that, and most importantly SIGN
> OFF on that. I am just the messenger. Hope this helps a little. Like I
> mentioned earlier, I am sure your college educ. dept. has lots of
> reference materials about this methodology. Go to a reference librarian,
> as that is the person who helps me do my searches.
>
>
>
> live from the bare's den.......
>
> Smokey
>
>
>