TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
> ----------
> From: Dale Barnes[SMTP:endale -at- LSUVM -dot- SNCC -dot- LSU -dot- EDU]
> Reply To: Dale Barnes
> Sent: Friday, February 06, 1998 7:34 AM
> To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
> Subject: Question about "respectively."
>
> A friend in the Chemistry Dept. sends me this query:
>
> > Here's a comment from a reviewer of a manuscript I submitted for
> >publication:
> >"Normally, when 'respectively' is used when referring to data, a
> comma
> >precedes it."
>
> Has anyone encountered this rule before? On what principle might it be
> based?
>
> Any help will be appreciated. Thanks
>
> Dale
>
>
>
>
> Arthur D. Barnes
> Department of English
> Louisiana State University
> Baton Rouge, LA 70808
> USA
>
>
> ~~
> Send commands to listserv -at- listserv -dot- okstate -dot- edu (e.g., SIGNOFF
> TECHWR-L)
> Search archives at:
>http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html,
>