TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re[2]: Documenting for LCD or most common? From:Jamie Yeager <jyeager -at- RADSYS -dot- COM> Date:Fri, 13 Feb 1998 11:34:43 -0500
barry-
i tried writing in collages, but they always stuck to my pen...finally i went to
decoupage instead...
jamie yeager
radian systems
"they can't pay me enough to have my opinions for me"
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Documenting for LCD or most common?
Author: barry -dot- kieffer -at- EXGATE -dot- TEK -dot- COM at Internet
Date: 2/13/98 08:20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keith Arnett [SMTP:Keith_Arnett -at- RESTON -dot- OMD -dot- STERLING -dot- COM]
> Sent: Friday, February 13, 1998 7:13 AM
> To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
> Subject: Re: Documenting for LCD or most common?
>
> Despite the shared name (and some functionality), Win 3.1 and Win
> 95
> are two different operating systems, and generally speaking, they
> should be documented separately.
The differences between Win 3.x and Win 95 are vast. Entire
papers are written in collages on this topic.
