TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:"The" before names From:stephen lubell <steven -at- RADMAIL -dot- RAD -dot- CO -dot- IL> Date:Wed, 1 Apr 1998 16:48:52 -0800
>From: "Geoff Hart" <geoff-h -at- mtl -dot- feric -dot- ca>
>To: steven -at- RADMAIL -dot- RAD -dot- CO -dot- IL
>Date: Wed, 1 Apr 1998 08:18:13 +0000
>Subject: "The" before names
>Reply-to: geoff-h -at- mtl -dot- feric -dot- ca
>Priority: normal
>
>Greets!
>
>Please forward this to techwr-l (minus the intro) for additional
>feedback and commentary if you find it helpful; I can't post directly
>to the list. Thanks!
>
>--Geoff
>
>***********
>Steven Lubell wondered about when to use "the" before product names
>or acronyms. A good first cut at this is to understand what the
>predominant usage happens to be; for example, the Ontario Ministry of
>Natural Resources was always called OMNR, and I don't recall ever
>having heard "the OMNR". So that's the way we did it: no "the".
>
>For a more specific rule that works really well, let's look at your
>example: [the?] ABC modem. In general, where you have the name being
>used as an adjective, use "the"; this is because you would say "the
>modem is on", not "modem is on". If you're referring to ABC itself,
>and not specifying what it is, then you're effectively treating the
>acronym as if it were a person (an entity, if you prefer), and no
>"the" is necessary. This is particularly true if you've made it a
>possessive form (e.g., "ABC's modem", not "the ABC's modem"). A
>grammarian could give you the jargon to pin this down exactly, but
>examples are probably more useful to show us non-grammarians the
>pattern. A few more examples:
>
>the Word macro language vs. Word's macro language vs. Word is a
>wordprocessor
>
>IBM's HQ is in Armonk (is it?) vs. IBM announced record profits
>yesterday vs. the IBM strategy is to move from selling big iron to
>selling services.
>
>the NASA program is under severe budgetary pressure vs. NASA is under
>severe budgetary pressure vs. NASA's program is...
>--Geoff Hart @8^{)}
>geoff-h -at- mtl -dot- feric -dot- ca
>
Stephen Lubell
Technical Documentation Department
RAD Data Communications Ltd
12 HaNechoshet Street
Tel Aviv 69710
Tel: ++972+3+6455306
Fax: ++972+3+6483331