TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Web vs. web? From:Michael Lewis <lewism -at- BRANDLE -dot- COM -dot- AU> Date:Thu, 2 Apr 1998 21:35:56 +1000
What's happening here is, subliminally, a distinction between "the Web"
and "a web". "Publishing to (or on) the Web" means making the document
available via the WWW; "dynamic web reports" can be published to (or on)
the Web or your local intraweb; the technology in the document is the
same either way. (I'll not buy into the question of how many I/internets
there are ... except that, if it's capitalised, then it's the one we all
use; if it ain't, then it's architecturally cognate but a different,
smaller thing.)
BTW, is publishing on the Web the same as publishing to the Web? I think
not. Publishing *to* the Web refers to the process of uploading;
publishing *on* the Web refers to use of the Web as a distribution
medium.
Jeanne A. E. DeVoto wrote:
>
> At 2:03 PM -0800 4/1/98, Susan Kocher wrote:
> >Has a consensus been reached in our profession regarding the way to
> >use "web" or "Web" to refer to the World Wide Web, to webs in general?
> >Or how about internet/Internet?
> >[...]
> >So, what say you, fellow whirlers? We want to come up with a policy that
> >is simple to implement for writers and editors. Leaving ALL of the
> >references to "Web" as they are above seems unsatisfactory; and yet
> >changing them all to "web" seems equally wrong.
>
> My rule of thumb: when it's a proper noun, use the capital (or the acronym
> WWW):
> -- publish reports to [or better, "on"] the Web
> -- publish reports to the WWW
> -- extend SAS Software to the Web
> -- extend SAS Software to the WWW
>
> and when it's used as an adjective, omit the capitalization:
> -- build interactive web applications
> -- create dynamic web reports
> Experience with HTML, web servers, and general web technology
> is helpful. For additional details about SAS web technology, check
> out our web page at http://www....html
>
> This seems to me to be both sensible and conformant with common usage.
>
> >And while we're at it, does there seem
> >to be general agreement that "internet" is now such a generic term that
> >it should be treated as such, i.e. not be capitalized?
>
> If you do that, then what new term will you coin for what's currently
> referred to as an internet? The words "Internet" and "internet" do not mean
> the same thing.
>
> --
> jeanne a. e. devoto ~ jaed -at- best -dot- com
>http://www.best.com/~jaed/
> Morning people may be respected, but night people are feared.
>
--
Michael Lewis
Brandle Pty Limited, Sydney, Australia
PO Box 1249, Strawberry Hills, NSW 2012
Suite 8, The Watertower, 1 Marian St, Redfern 2016 http://www.brandle.com.au/~lewism
Tel +61-2-9310-2224 ... Fax +61-2-9310-5056