Re: evergreen document

Subject: Re: evergreen document
From: "Palmer, Phyllis" <PPalmer -at- SPHERECOM -dot- COM>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1998 16:48:22 -0500

Pardon me for beating this one to death, but, how does one keep control
over the revisions on this "ever green/living" document?
Phyllis

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Parks, Beverly [SMTP:ParksB -at- EMH1 -dot- HQISEC -dot- ARMY -dot- MIL]
> Sent: Thursday, April 09, 1998 4:40 PM
> To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
> Subject: Re: evergreen document
>
> Good grief. It just makes one want to run screaming from the room.
> Never
> heard of it (until now), but it probably means the same as a "living
> document". In other words, the document is updated as changes
> occur--always current.
>
> Bev Parks
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Judy Fraser [SMTP:jfraser -at- GLINX -dot- COM]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 09, 1998 1:51 PM
> > To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
> > Subject:
> >
> > Has anyone heard the term "evergreen document"?
> >
> > i.e., ...the manual [...] should be maintained as an evergreen
> > document"
> >
> >
>
> &^~~~
> Send commands to listserv -at- listserv -dot- okstate -dot- edu (e.g., SIGNOFF
> TECHWR-L)
> Find TECHWR-L-related books at
> http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/books.htm
>




Previous by Author: Re: THE IBM
Next by Author: Digest Subscription Instructions
Previous by Thread: Re: evergreen document
Next by Thread: Re: evergreen document


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads