TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Help needed on Term From:Roger Mallett <roger -at- CSICAL -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 5 May 1998 09:03:55 -0700
Joseph is dead on the money.
---------------------
Roger Mallett
Control Systems
(714) 458-5040 x 239
>----------
>From: Joseph McRoy (Roy) Anderson[SMTP:royanderson -at- IBM -dot- NET]
>Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 1998 7:54 AM
>To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
>Subject: Re: Help needed on Term
>
>
>Ellen,
>
>Yes, "user exit" is a legitimate programming term in widespread use for
>over thirty years. It functions as you described it, as predefined
>"hooks"
>upon which a client firm's programmers can "attach" custom programming
>code
>to further expand client-oriented functionality.
>
>The IBM term "user macro exit" was served the same function within
>large-scale
>mainframe circles. Don't know if it is still in use, but should you
>encounter
>the term, replace it with "user exit".
>
>Ellen Gorlow wrote:
>>
>> In the documentation I'm editing (translated from a German original) the
>> following is called a "user exit": A place in a program where you can
>> attach your own piece of programming.
>> Can anyone confirm if "user exit" is the correct term to use.
>> Ellen Gorlow
>> Technical Writer
>> Viasoft
>> egorlow -at- viasoft -dot- com
>>
>
>~~~
>
>
>
