TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: Interview Questions (deliberately veering from techie
Subject:Re: Interview Questions (deliberately veering from techie From:Karen Kay <karen -at- WORDWRITE -dot- COM> Date:Mon, 11 May 1998 22:45:01 -0700
Lisa Comeau said:
> In my recent interview for the job I hold now (it's my 1-month anniversary
> here today!) they asked alot of good probing questions like:
>
> "What was your best subject in University?"
This is a good, probing question???
> The number one question I have asked and been asked is
>
> "What do you know about our company/organization? How did you find
> out this info?" (Fortunately, I check out a company BEFORE I even think
> about applying there...)
>
> This is a great question for people in a technical field, because the more
> they tell you, the more interested they are in the company, and it gives
> you (as an interviewer) and idea of the candidate's research skills.
I don't know about you, but I research companies quite differently
than I do research about the products I'm documenting. For companies,
I use the web primarily, and people secondarily. (Particularly when
I'm interviewing outside my current field, as happens a lot.) My
research skills when it comes to work are quite different. I use
anything written that I can find, but mostly I depend on people.
> If a potential employee doesn't do any research on the company, how
> can they possibly know if the job/organization is right for them,
> and that they are right for the position?
This time around, I'm interviewing managers, not companies. It's
working well for me.