TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: WORD 97 - Character Styles From:Mary McWilliams Johnson <mary -at- SUPERCONNECT -dot- COM> Date:Mon, 22 Jun 1998 23:06:00 -0500
Thanks. I can't believe i've been using Word these last 13 years and never
knew it was capable of setting character styles ! ! !
Cordially, Mary
==================
At 08:29 PM 6/22/98 -0700, Wilcox, John (WWC, Contractor) wrote:
>> ----------
>> From: Ridder, Fred[SMTP:F -dot- Ridder -at- DIALOGIC -dot- COM]
>>
>> Here's an alternative solution that works in Word 95 (and which
>> hopefully
>> works the same way in Word 97...):
>> 1) Define a character style that is applied to the heading text.
>> 2) Insert a TC (table of contents entry) field code that references
>> that
>> character style using a nested STYLEREF field code.
>> 3) Build your ToC from the TC fields using the \t switch.
>>
>> For example, define a style called "char runninghead" and apply it to
>> the heading text. Then, some place after the text of each heading,
>> insert a nested field code { TC "{ STYLEREF "runninghead" }" }. Then
>> generate the ToC using a field code something like { TOC \o "1-4" \t
>> },
>> which will pick up the standard Heading 1 through Heading 4 entries
>> (specified by the \o switch and the "1-3" parameter) plus the TC
>> field codes (specified via the \t switch).
>>
>Having to come up with such a convoluted workaround is exactly why I say
>that having to use Winword to do long documents is like having to use a
>sledge hammer and a chain saw to do fine cabinetry.
>
>That said, Fred, what do you do if your sidehead goes to multiple lines?
>No, you really need two horizontally juxtaposed paragraphs, which is, as
>you have shown, so nigh unto impossible that very few users would happen
>upon a solution. (Meanwhile, in Frame or Ventura it's a no-brainer.
>Thanks again, Mr. Bill.)
>
>
>Regards,
>
>John Wilcox, Documentation Specialist