TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Technical Writing Training From:Maria <mariac -at- NAS -dot- NET> Date:Wed, 15 Jul 1998 19:49:46 -0700
Hi:
This message is for everyone who wrote to me requesting that I compile all
the replies I received from list members on Technical Writing training
(online and through correspondence) and post it to this list.
Within the next couple of days I will do just that. (I promise!!!!)
Regards,
Maria
----------
> From: Amy Lodato <a -dot- lodato -at- INTERSHOP -dot- COM>
> To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
> Subject: Re: Technical Writing Workshop - Query by Amy Lodato
> Date: Tuesday, July 14, 1998 2:25 PM
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Let me fill in some background on this tech writing workshop idea. My
> original query (copied below) was a fishing expedition to see if there
> was any desire for such a workshop and to get specific ideas on what
> people would like to cover. The impetus was a call for presentations at
> an STC conference; I thought I'd submit a proposal for the topic area
> "Writing Tuneup for Experienced Writers."
>
> I was surprised and delighted by the number of "Sign me up!" and "Me
> too" messages that flooded my box. Meanwhile, Rowena
> (rhart -at- intrinsyc -dot- com) had the brilliant inspiration of putting such a
> workshop together on-line. I think she's moving forward with that
> project, and I'd like to stay involved with it.
>
> But now for the caveat. The STC conference I was thinking of isn't until
> October, and I can't start really working on this project until the end
> of August, due to some other time commitments. So... hopefully the
> online workshop won't be over and done with before I can participate,
> but I'm not ready to offer anything concrete right away. Maybe Rowena
> can respond to the list with a progress report from her end, and I will
> keep you posted as I work on my end. Meanwhile, if you get more specific
> ideas on subject matter, I hope you'll keep me/us in mind and let us
> know them!
>
> Best regards,
>
> Amy Lodato
> a -dot- lodato -at- intershop -dot- com
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: indresh chauhan [SMTP:indreshchauhan -at- HOTMAIL -dot- COM]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 1998 10:09 AM
> > To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
> > Subject: Technical Writing Workshop - Query by Amy Lodato
> >
> > Hello everyone,
> > An on-line technical writing workshop that promises a writing skills
> > 'tuneup', brainstorms new ideas and is (gasp) free. Wow, what more
> > would
> > anyone want? Amy, count me in. When do I join?!
> > Regards,
> > Indresh Chauhan
> > indreshchauhan -at- hotmail -dot- com
> >
> >
> Original post
>
> Dear fellow wordsmiths,
>
> If you saw a workshop targeted toward professional, experienced tech
> writers that promised a writing skills "tuneup," would you be
> interested? If so, what topics would you want to cover? For example, are
> there grammatical issues you wouldn't mind hammering out? Would you
> like ideas on how to organize and consolidate information? (I don't
> think I could bring myself to use the term "chunking" in relation to my
> work, but maybe I'm alone in that.) Other issues altogether?
>
> Let's assume this workshop was both reputable and free-- what would you
> like to see in it?
> Have you ever taken a workshop or course that drastically improved your
> professional writing style?
>
> Feel free to respond on-list or off, and thanks in advance for any
> feedback.
>
> Best,
> Amy Lodato
>
>
>
>