TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
My own experience is this: my writing is as much design as it is
writing. I find that I write better and faster when I see exactly how
the information is going to be presented to the user. I would not want
to write and turn it over to anyone else.
Now, graphics, on the other hand -- well, that's not my thing. I'm
adequate, but not great, in that area, so I'd just as soon admit my
limitations and have a professional do that stuff when I have the
luxury. I have no doubt that others feel about their graphics the way I
feel about info design. That just proves, IMHO, that there is no right
or wrong way to write -- it depends on the strengths and preferences of
the writer and the resources that are available.
A.
--
Alexia Prendergast Tech Pubs Manager, Seagate Software
If developers wrote error messages in Haiku (author unknown)...
Serious error.
All shortcuts have disappeared.
Screen. Mind. Both are blank.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bernie McCann [mailto:BernieMc -at- AOL -dot- COM]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 1998 1:37 PM
> To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
> Subject: DEBATE: Word-processing or DTP
> Personaly, and generally speaking, I prefer writers to do
> what they ought to
> do best - write. Their tool for this should be a
> word-processor. Upon
> completion of that task, it should be finished by a really
> competent computer
> operator using a dtp application (someone who would have no
> problem with the
> difficult questions seen on this newsgroup .... and someone
> who, probably,
> doesn't even read this).