Re: Being dumb...

[Jason Willebeek-LeMair <jlemair -at- ITEXCHSRV2 -dot- PHX -dot- MCD -dot- MOT -dot- COM>]

Ahh.  You assume I was replying to your post with that one.  Please go
back to the post previous where I said, well, exactly what you just did.

Cheers,

Jason

> ----------
> From:         Tracy Boyington
> Reply To:     Tracy Boyington
> Sent:         Tuesday, August 11, 1998 2:18 PM
> To:   TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
> Subject:      Re: Being dumb...
>
> > I, for one, would welcome someone from engineering, law, basket
> weaving,
> > secretarial, janitorial, or any other field who was truly interested
> in
> > learning how to 'whirl.
>
> Seems like people are replying to what they *think they read* or
> *wanted
> to argue about* instead of what was really said.
>
> Who said typists, secretaries, doctors, popes, etc. cannot be tech
> writers? The posts I read simply said being good at one of these
> professions does not automatically make you a good tech writer or even
> a
> potential tech writer. It doesn't automatically make you a teacher
> either, or a truck driver or an architect.
>
> I'm not being an elitist and I'm not afraid someone "less worthy" is
> going to take my job. I'm just asking, since we're all supposed to be
> such great communicators, if we can please respond to what the post
> really says.
>
> Tracy
> --
> ===========================================================
> Tracy Boyington         mailto:tracy_boyington -at- okvotech -dot- org
> Oklahoma Dept. of Vocational & Technical Education
> Curriculum & Instructional Materials Center
> Stillwater, Oklahoma    http://www.okvotech.org/cimc/
> ===========================================================
>
>
>
>
>

 From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=