TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: A question of Grammar From:Linda Castellani <linda -at- GRIC -dot- COM> Date:Mon, 24 Aug 1998 16:37:53 -0700
"Type into" looks strange to me, yet no one else has commented on that
aspect of this. Shouldn't it be "Type the supplier's address *in* the
box"? Not, "Type the supplier's address *into* the box"? With the added
benefit that it eliminates the need to worry about "Address of the
supplier" versus "Address for the supplier."
The reason I ask is because I've noticed that I see usage such as "Input
the address" which seems equally strange to me, and I wonder, what's wrong
with saying, "Enter the address in the box"?
I almost hate to mention this, out of fear that these constructions have
become the latest thing, sort of like the one space/two space debate, or
that this is the kind of grammar question that Eric doesn't want to see on
the list.
>Chris Hill asks:
>
>I'm in the process of authoring What's This Help for an application.
>One field, labelled Address, is used to capture address details. In
>terms of the Help text, which is appropriate,
>
>'Type the Address of the supplier into this box'
>
>or
>
>'Type the Address for the supplier into this box'.
>
==========================
Linda Castellani
Technical Writer
GRIC Communications, Inc.
1421 McCarthy Blvd.
Milpitas, CA 95035