TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Need Professional Advice From:"Porrello, Leonard" <leonard -dot- porrello -at- COMPAQ -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 25 Aug 1998 05:47:09 -0700
I have no advice but would like to exhort respondents to respond on-line. A
friend is in a similar situation, and I'd like to know of how it might be
resolved.
Leonard Porrello
Compaq, Telecom Solutions Division
Pubs, Omaha
402.384.7390
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kimberly
> Sent: Monday, August 24, 1998 9:41 PM
> To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
> Subject: Need Professional Advice
>
> I need professional advice.
>
> Today I started a new tech writing contract, a six months-to-perm term.
>
> I have found, today, that I think I misunderstood the nature of the system
> I would be documenting; it's also probable that the client overestimated
> my
> knowledge of the industry in question (manufacturing, inventory control,
> financial tracking, etc.).
>
> In any case, I hate this job. I have no desire to continue working on
> mainframe systems, and I am completely out of my depth regarding the
> financial/manufacturing knowledge.
>
> My question is: What do I do? How can I gracefully back out of the
> contract, while preserving the reputation of me and my employer? How long
> should I "give it a try" until I make my final decision? (My instincts are
> very strong on this, but in fairness, I haven't given it a reasonable try
> yet.)
>
> Please advise. Offline would probably be better.