TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Word to HTML Conversion summary From:Sergej Rinc <info -at- SINONIM -dot- SI> Date:Mon, 9 Nov 1998 15:02:56 +0100
Sorry I haven't replied sooner (a lot of work).
-----Original Message-----
From: Mary McWilliams Johnson <mary -at- SUPERCONNECT -dot- COM>
Date: 22. oktober 1998 5:05
Subject: Re: Word to HTML Conversion summary
>At 12:03 PM 10/22/98 +0100, Sergej Rinc wrote:
>>
>><snipped>
>>Once HTMLed, the file NEVER goes back to Word as HTML. If I want/need to
end
>>the file, I rename it to *.txt and import it into Word (with all the nasty
>>HTML code) where I edit to my little heart's desire. Since it is NOT a
Word
>>file - make certain to SAVE AS PLAIN TEXT - Word does not attempt to
>>"rename" anything -- including <IMG SRC="">. This is not a "been
there/done
>>that" sort of thing ... this is "am here/doing this" - real life for me.
>></snipped>
>I wonder if the above comment is a bit misleading. Your Word document
>remains intact after you use the Word command to "save as HTML."
I haven't wrote that! I've just stated some thought about announced MS
Word 2000. My opinion about *current version*of Word (that is 97) is the
same as yours. MS Word 2000 will (at least Microsoft claims that) enable all
Word features in HTML editing too (except versioning and password
protection).
I also use Visual InterDev 97 (we haven't upgraded to 6.0 because of just
that - messing up with hand written code!). In our company we are
considering Dreamweaver for its quality and cross-browser support yet
someone has to persuade me about its workgroup features and site updates (at
least what's in Front Page 98 would be fine).
And I do use Word for HTML creation and especially single sourcing - but
with a great support by Doc-To-Help. Of course - as you mentioned - I would
go nuts with word processor other than Word because of all nice features I
use to live with (and can't live without them - Replace, macros, fields
etc).
For some slides (actually 27 ;-) about single sourcing and current trends
(HTML Help) you are invited to browse my paper I've presented at Technical
Communication and Usability Conference
(<http://www.hermes.si/TechCommConf/index.html>). Here is PowerPoint 97
presentation (123 K, sorry, don't have the page available in English yet):
<http://www.sinonim.si/intranet/Singlsrc.ppt>