Re: Technical name for the #?

Subject: Re: Technical name for the #?
From: Gareth Rowlands <rowlands -at- CLICKPLANET -dot- COM>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 12:25:50 -0600

Doug & Michelle are absolutely right when they say the key is to use a
term that people will understand. All I would add is that there are
times when using "octothorpe" would be appropriate - for example, when
producing documentation for telecom engineers.

The point is that documentation should have as its goal the ability to
reach the audiance for which its being produced.

Gareth Rowlands
Technical Writer
Click Interactive

From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=




Previous by Author: Re: [Fwd: graphics package]
Next by Author: One last competition is open...
Previous by Thread: Re: Technical name for the #?
Next by Thread: Re: Technical name for the #?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads