TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:FrameMaker --> Web Publisher --> Javahelp From:Paul Carr <solas -at- JPS -dot- NET> Date:Sat, 5 Dec 1998 06:09:10 -0800
>From: "goldd -at- netspace -dot- net -dot- au" <goldd -at- NETSPACE -dot- NET -dot- AU>
>Subject: FrameMaker --> Web Publisher --> Javahelp
>
>I have to implement some online help lickety-split. The software commitment
>I'm locked into is to use FrameMaker 5.5.6+SGML and convert it via Web
>Publisher to Javahelp. Has anyone implemented these successfully?
>
>The archives have a number of postings on various combinations of the above
>software; and the consensus, seems to be that they're a good solution.
>However, Javahelp is still in beta so I'd be happy to hear from anyone whose
>implemented this solution successfully. In particular, what is the best way
>of preparing FrameMaker for porting to Javahelp? Also, what are the
>important 'Watch-outs', 'Gotchas' and 'Workarounds' you've encountered?
>BTW the online help is to be embedded in IBM's Visual Age.
I am using publisher with frame. I recently downloaded javahelp 1.0 and
installed it, and then attempted to use the publisher javahelp template
to make a test file. I think I was able to make the help file, but I
couldn't get the viewer to work. You have to go through a DOS prompt to
get the viewer to function, but it just didn't work, and I was merely
experimenting, so I did not pursue it.
Publisher notes that javahelp is still quite buggy. I have the feeling
that it may simply not be at a stage where one can use it reliably.