TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: PDF vs. paper From:Scott Miller <smiller -at- PORTAL -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 16 Dec 1998 14:14:44 -0800
Even though I think printed docs are easier to use overall than online docs,
I still advocate online documentation wherever it works (not in a steam pit,
whatever that is) for a couple of reasons, one of them being the
tree-hugging thing, and the other being that it's a young media, and we're
getting better at it. If we keep at it, someday it will be better than print
overall. Look at some Windows help files from just 4 years ago to see how
much better we are at writing help. Also, online docs are a lot more fun and
interesting to write. More challenging, too, which is another indication
that online docs are more difficult to use than printed.
- Scott M
smiller -at- portal -dot- com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
> In support of on-line documentation, there's another factor that everyone
> seems a bit reticint to address: The affect on the environment. Growing
> up
> in a resource-based economy taught me the value of trees, among other
> things. Consider how much paper would be saved if say, ten percent of
> software products now shipping with hardcopy chose not on-line docs
> instead.
> Call me a tree-hugger, but this, more than any turbid inclinations of the
> users or writers alike, seems a worthwhile advantage. DB.
>
>