TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Donald Feidner wrote, "Information already exists and we make something out
of it -- but you can't really DEVELOP it."
While I respect his viewpoint, I cannot agree with it. In a technical
sense, information does not exist, data does. Webster's Collegiate
Dictionary defines information as, "knowledge communicated or received
concerning a particular fact or circumstance -- knowledge gained through
study, communication, research, etc."
I believe that, as defined above, we gather various data from many
resources and we develop information (knowledge) based on our
interpretation of that data. Interpretation is the key to the title of
Information Developer, in my opinion, because Donald and I may view the
same data from the same or different sources, but *develop* quite different
information sets from it.
Think about the dictionary, it contains a great many words which we can
consider to be the data. How differently could you develop information from
those words than I?
David Dubin
This has been one man's opinion, yours may vary with mileage.