Re: Invisible ink?

[John Gilger <jgilger_it -at- NV -dot- DOE -dot- GOV>]

All I can suggest is to restrict access to these drafts.  Only allow
those you trust to read or handle them.  Keep a tight control on them.

This can make working with them a real PITA but it works for the
government (usually).

If you have members of your organization that would copy this info for
their "friend" you ought to consider asking them to go to work
elsewhere.

My $0.02

John

        -----Original Message-----
        From:   Steven Jong [SMTP:SteveFJong -at- AOL -dot- COM]
        Sent:   Tuesday, January 26, 1999 7:56 AM
        To:     TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
        Subject:        Invisible ink?

        We develop some products to combat cell-phone fraud. We would
like to keep
        some of the information out of the hands of professional frauds,
and it struck
        me that if we could restrict photocopying of draft documents,
that might help.

        We played around briefly with ink colors that resisted
photocopying, but
        didn't find anything effective. Do you have any suggestions to
offer on how to
        restrict the flow of information?

                  -- Steve (going against the flow)

        Steven Jong, Documentation Team Manager ("Typo?  What tpyo?")
        Lightbridge, Inc, 67 S. Bedford St., Burlington, MA 01803 USA
        mailto:Jong -at- lightbridge -dot- com   781.359.4902[V], 781.359.4500[F]
        Home Sweet Homepage: http://members.aol.com/SteveFJong


 =======================================================================
===
        Send commands to listserv -at- listserv -dot- okstate -dot- edu (e.g., SIGNOFF
TECHWR-L)
        Search archives at:
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/archives.htm
        Find rules and info at
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/listinfo.htm



 From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=