TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Well, this is all rather subjective, but my inclination is to say that
you're probably entry-level in your first year or so. Additionally,
entry-level seems to infer youth, or general job inexperience. I mean, is an
admin assistant with ten years of experience and some programming knowledge
still entry-level?
I'd prefer to refer to them as junior, along with anybody else who had maybe
1 - 3 years experience. The job postings I see tend to indicate that a
senior tech writer has had at least 5 years of experience. Thoughts? DB.
-----Original Message-----
From: Schrank, Kelly (Tampa) [mailto:schrank -at- TAMPA -dot- GENPHYSICS -dot- COM]
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 1999 1:29 PM
To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
Subject: Re: entry level pay
Is that really true? Junior is with one year of experience? What are you
called with two? I thought there was a discussion in the past that said
that entry level was, for most people, the first few years of a job? What
do the rest of you think?
Kelly Schrank
Technical Editor
General Physics
Schrank -at- tampa -dot- genphysics -dot- com <mailto:Schrank -at- tampa -dot- genphysics -dot- com>