Re: stopping photocopying, take II

[Rowena Hart <rhart -at- XCERT -dot- COM>]

Scott,

Controlling photocopying may not apply to you, but it is
a serious security issue for some organizations who
deal with extremely sensitive proprietary technology,
military secrets, or financial information.

There are a great number of people on the list who are
interested in this subject, and I've never seen it discussed
before.  It's important to remember that a lot of people
need a three or four days to respond to messages -- they
may be behind on their digest reading, or too busy to
respond the first day a thread is discussed.  Give it time
and this thread will die a natural death.  In the meantime,
learn to use the delete key.

Rowena

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Rowena Hart   Technical Writer

Xcert International Inc.
1001-701 West Georgia Street  Phone:  1 (604) 640-6210
Vancouver, BC, Canada V7Y 1C6  Fax: 1 (604) 640-6220
Web: http://www.xcert.com    E-mail: rhart -at- xcert -dot- com

----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Havens <SHavens -at- ELCOTEL -dot- COM>
To: <TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU>
Date: Wednesday, January 27, 1999 10:10 AM
Subject: Re: stopping photocopying, take II


>I can't believe this thread has gone on so long.  Just about every
>suggestion I've read would cause serious impairment for those who were
>intended to READ the books in the first place, so I think somebody's
>suggestion that we try to CONTROL our documentation instead of making it
>"uncopiable" is a much better idea.
>
>Or maybe we should just make all our manuals from some extremely
>unstable material, so that the light from the copy machine would cause
>them to explode and burn.  Just another helpful (if not constructive)
>suggestion...
>
>SRH
>
>
>From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000==
>


 From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=