TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: Is Custom Installation a Feasible Tool for Improving MS Word Performance? (Was: MS Word question)
Subject:Re: Is Custom Installation a Feasible Tool for Improving MS Word Performance? (Was: MS Word question) From:"Townsend, Emru" <etownsend -at- POSITRON -dot- QC -dot- CA> Date:Tue, 2 Feb 1999 16:47:34 -0500
Richard,
The custom installation of Word 97 is identical to that of Word 6.0 and Word
95; it's not the same thing as how Word 2000 works.
In Word 97 (or Office 97), you can do a custom install and select which
components you want to have installed. For instance, I never bother to
install the Office Binder, because I don't yet have a need for it. (I
always do a custom install for any application that gives me a choice.
Because I do a lot of graphics and animation work as well as hardware and
software reviews, hard disk space is always at a premium. Besides, why
install stuff you don't need?)
Office 98 on the Mac works as Suzette described. If I don't install the
grammar checker, and, a week later, click on Grammar Checker in Word, Office
will then automatically install it -- without my having to exit Word to fire
up the installation program. Office 2000 will have the same capability.
Emru Townsend
Technical Communications Wiseguy - Product Integration
Positron Public Safety Systems Inc.
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
e-mail: etownsend -at- positron -dot- qc -dot- ca
My words are my own. Confuse them with my employer's at your own risk.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Feldman [SMTP:rfeldman -at- CFSLC -dot- COM]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 1999 4:00 PM
> To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
> Subject: Is Custom Installation a Feasible Tool for Improving MS Word
> Performance? (Was: MS Word question)
>
> Apologies if this has been addressed since the last digest went out:
>
> On Mon, 1 Feb 1999 10:33:00 -0500 Suzette Seveny <sseveny -at- PETVALU -dot- COM>
> responded to:
>
> >> Supposedly, the next incarnation of Word is going to offer a more
> modular
> >> installation, so you can actually leave out features you don't use.
> When
> you
> >> decide you really do want the grammar checker installed, the system
> >> automatically installs it the first time you need it. I'm curious to
> see
> how
> >> this works, but I have a feeling it's not going to work as advertised.
> If it
> >> does, it might reduce some of the overhead in Word.
>
> with:
>
> >Actually, you have this option now. When you install, select Custom
> >Installation, and select only the features you need. Grammar checking,
> etc.,
> >are all options. If you later decide you want the Grammar checker, you
> can
> >simply install that portion.
>
> Has anyone actually tried using Custom Installation to improve the
> behavior of Word 97? If so, what were your results?
>
> Richard
>
>