TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Advice on Resumes From:John Posada <john -at- TDANDW -dot- COM> Date:Mon, 15 Feb 1999 15:02:54 -0500
> > First, what is the problem with asking how the recipient wants it?
>
> Nothing at all, but my experience is that relatively few
> clients/employers express a preference, and those who have one
> express it in terms of exclusion, e.g., "Anything but PDF or
> WordPerfect." I have certainly never had anyone say that they just
I've never had anyone say XX format and absolutely nothing else, but I have had those that said I'd rather have it in XX format and I've never
had anyone not state a preference. Whenever I've asked, they had a preference.
> positively must have it in, say, HTML or PDF or MacWrite 1.0, and
> nothing else. If they did, I'd be inclined to think they're so
> hopelessly screwed up and/or stupid that I wouldn't want them as an
> employer or client.
> > Second, I keep my resume in several formats [etc.]
>
> Okay, if you want to go to all the trouble AND if it works for you, no
> problem. But someone just getting started in the job market needs to
> make getting *a* resume out his or her first priority, and creating
> umpteen different versions of it really ought to be a secondary concern.
I don't offer these formats because I "can"..I do so because I've been asked for that format. Besides, knowing what I do know about document
delivery, I recognize the strengths of each format and use the format in a particular situation because I know it is the best format for that
situation. ASCII because it works best in an email, html because it works best as a web page, PDF because of its strengths and Word because of
agency preferences.
A substantial part of a tech writer's credentials is not just content creation, but content delivery. If a writer is doing a 100% job on
content, they are still only doing 50% of the job function. Knowing how to delivery effectively is just as important.
> The fact that you *can* create a resume in several electronic formats
> doesn't mean that you *have to*. It can be a lot of work with no clear
> benefit. For TWs, it might show that they have some grasp of all these
> different formats, but I'm inclined to think you might do better to
> present samples of your work.
You have to if it is required. If I ask someone to send me a format that I know is very common in the business, such as PDF, HTML, etc., and
they say they cannot, but at the same time claim themselves as an experienced tech writer, I will be suspect of their qualifications. Besides,
it isn't a case of samples OR resume...strong instances of both are required.