TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
In our previous episode, Moore, Tracey said:
> I posted a little while back about my documents not printing correctly.
> The problem was fixed temporarily by installing a new printer driver.
> But, alas, the problem came back!
>
> I spent all day long on the phone with Microsoft today, and it turns out
> that my 17 documents that I spent two weeks working on, are corrupted.
> They must have been corrupted early on, because the original files are
> bad as well. (I save copies every day.) Microsoft says the only way to
> save the docs is to create a txt file from the docs and re-format, and
> reinsert the graphics. I might as well recreate the darned things.
>
> Does anyone know of a utility that locates corruption and fixes Word
> docs? Any thoughts on how to make this less painful?
My last-chance procedure to fix corrupted documents that I could open
but then things went wonky was to save them in Word for DOS 6.0
format, making sure to create a style sheet (.sty file) to hold any
document styles.
It takes a certain amount of reworking to get them back into Word for
Windows, but if the save-as worked, the document wasn't corrupt
anymore.
Good luck.
*********************************************************************
Beth Friedman bjf -at- wavefront -dot- com
When you're shooting the rapids is _not_ the time for a long
multimedia presentation on the engineering dynamics of
rapids-shooting, complete with bitter arguments between proponents of
two different theories of fluid dynamics.
-- Patrick Nielsen Hayden