TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Frame Maker and Interleaf From:Hollister Technical Services <Holtec -at- COMITY -dot- DEMON -dot- CO -dot- UK> Date:Mon, 15 Mar 1999 12:32:36 +0000
Hello folks,
There is a large amount of correspondence on the list about the relative
merits of Frame Maker, Word, Quark Express, Page Maker and so forth. The
consensus seems to be that Frame is 'best'.
Is it a bias in the list or are all the other similar tools 'out there'
just not up to it? Does anyone know of a comparative review of *all* the
viable Technical Authoring tools?
Specifically can anyone say whether Interleaf is 'in the frame' as a
suitable tool?
I speak, forgive me, as one who only Words documents (until I can afford
something better).
--
Peter Jones
e-mail
Holtec -at- comity -dot- demon -dot- co -dot- uk
