TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: Popular Culture Deals with the Online/Print Documentation Que stion
Subject:Re: Popular Culture Deals with the Online/Print Documentation Que stion From:"Comeau, Lisa" <Lisa -dot- Comeau -at- MOH -dot- GOV -dot- ON -dot- CA> Date:Wed, 24 Mar 1999 12:08:30 -0500
How about when they send broadcast messages that the server will be down,
but they send 'em through the server? ;-)
Also, a friend deleted his CD-ROM drivers. Fortunately, they came bundled
with the software - on a CD... ;-)
Cheers!
Lisa Comeau
-----Original Message-----
From: Toni Williams TPG/SG [mailto:towilliams -at- PROCYONGROUP -dot- COM]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 1999 12:02 PM
To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
Subject: Re: Popular Culture Deals with the Online/Print Documentation
Que stion
Reminds me of when my previous company made changes to the e-mail program
then e-mailed everyone instructions for opening it which could not be read
because we couldn't open our e-mail.
Toni Williams
towilliams -at- procyongroup -dot- com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HICKEY, John David [SMTP:jdhickey -at- GROUPE-PROGESTIC -dot- COM]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 1999 8:07 AM
> To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
> Subject: Re: Popular Culture Deals with the Online/Print
> Documentation Que stion
>
> >That cartoon's not so far from the truth. A few years ago, Xerox Corp.
> >(my employer at the time) was using microfiche to distribute its copier
> [...]
> >whole story. It was quite a "Catch 22" situation, though: if you
> >didn't know how to use a fiche viewer, you couldn't read the manual; if
> >you got so you could read the manual, you didn't need it. That viewer
>
<snip>
> Of course, the licensing
> agreement said something along the lines of: "By opening this package,
> you agree to the terms described herein." You could never see the
> licensing agreement without opening the package and by then, it was too
> late. <g>
<snip>