TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
>I need some answers regarding use of the word "restart".
>Many of our documents use the word "restart" to mean
>both "stop" and "start". In effect, we are assuming that the
>user knows that the server has stopped due to a failure
>or because the administrator manually stopped the
>server to reset certain services or operations. "Services
>will continue using these settings until the server is
>restarted," for example.
>
>"Restart" does not appear in the Microsoft Manual of
>Style, and the Microsoft Press Computer Dictionary refers
>the reader from "restart" to "reboot", which it defines as
>"To restart a computer by reloading the operating system."
>
>Have any of you wrestled with the word before? Is it
>acceptable to add "stop" to the meaning of this word?
>What style/usage guidelines did you establish?
I think "restart" is fine. System administrators, especially, are familiar
with it, including the optional extra meaning of "stop first".
I'm afraid I disagree with Scott Wahl's comment. Well, I agree that
"restart" is redundant if the system is already stopped, but I also think
that redundancy has many uses, such as confirming and reinforcing the
reader's understanding. That is, not all redundancy is good and not all
redundancy is bad.
If you were guiding a sysadmin through some procedure in person, you'd say,
"And now restart the system", not "And now start the system." The latter
suggests, well, just getting started in the first place, as opposed to an
action in the middle of a series of actions.