TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Power Words From:Marilynne Smith <marilyns -at- QUALCOMM -dot- COM> Date:Fri, 30 Apr 1999 16:41:34 -0700
You're correct, the industry commonly uses these terms. I also believe
that "plugs" and "receptacles" are much better terms. They are clear and
specific. We used to live in a male dominated world. We may still live
there, but things are changing, word by word. Is there a good reason to
use the old terms - maybe, but I wouldn't do it without a good argument.
Marilynne <who (ancient history) once stood and blushed while someone
explained male and female connectors to her>
At 04:21 PM 4/30/99 , Jason Willebeek-LeMair wrote:
>Jan,
>
>I assure you, male and female connectors are quite common terms in the
>hardware world.
>
>But, don't take my word for it. Go to the PICMG (PCI Industrial Computers
>Manufacturers Group) web site ( http://www.picmg.com/amain.htm ),
>specifically, the CompactPCI pages ( http://www.picmg.com/acompactpci.htm ),
>and use your browser's page search feature to look for "male" and "female."
>The first hit you get will be under the Connector Definitions heading.
>
>Jason
>Who Prefers Gender-Neutral Connectors
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jan Boomsliter [mailto:boomah -at- CONCENTRIC -dot- NET]
>Sent: Friday, April 30, 1999 4:12 PM
>To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
>Subject: Re: Power Words
>
>
>How are you going to define "vulgar?" It's another "in the eyes of the
>beholder" definition, don't you think?
>
>As for industry standard, I beg to differ. I never learned it that way, nor
>do
>we write or teach about anything but plugs and receptacles. For that matter,
>I
>don't believe I've ever read otherwise, either.
>
>Jan
>
>From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000==
>
>
>
~!~ ~!~ ~!~ ~!~ ~!~ ~!~ ~!~ ~!~ ~!~ ~!~ ~!~ ~!~ ~!~
Marilynne Smith marilyns -at- qualcomm -dot- com
Sr. Technical Writer (619) 651-6664
QUALCOMM AE-203B
"We'll have the whole world talking"