TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Frame opinions From:Melissa Clark <clark -at- DATAPHYSICS -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 4 May 1999 11:30:33 -0700
Sorry about the repeated question.
I will check the archives.
Please disregard previous question.
Thanks,
Melissa
-----Original Message-----
From: Sarah O'Keefe [SMTP:okeefe -at- scriptorium -dot- com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 1999 11:30 AM
To: Melissa Clark
Cc: techwr-l -at- listserv -dot- okstate -dot- edu
Subject: Re: Frame opinions
>I am doing a comparison of Microsoft Word and Adobe FrameMaker on the =
>effectiveness of using either of them for printed documentation (mostly =
>long documentation, like manuals).=20
>
>Would anyone be willing to give me their opinion of Adobe FrameMaker, =
>with regards to long printed documentation?
Is this a troll?
You might check the archives; this topic has been done many times, and
there are lots of white papers out there comparing the two.
