TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: Stick with RoboHelp, or upgrade to something else?
Subject:Re: Stick with RoboHelp, or upgrade to something else? From:Suzanne Pyle <comline -at- GREENNET -dot- NET> Date:Wed, 16 Jun 1999 17:22:06 -0400
Is anyone familiar with RoboHelp's 7.0 version? Just bought it! (gulp), and yes
$500 buckeroos. Need to know how extensive the HTML (WebHelp) portion is. Have
you used it to create forms? I'm looking to use the WebHelp portion for an
interactive training site.
Suzanne
Tom Huffman wrote:
> Sean:
>
> RoboHelp is a good product, but it's outrageous that Blue Sky releases a new
> version each year and asks approximately $400.00 from licensed users to
> upgrade. I know of no other company that is so brazenly greedy.
>
> ****
>
> > Hallo:
> >
> > Your post sounds a little like a troll because only you know how much time
> > you have to teach yourself any new software, including the RoboHelp
> > upgrades.
> >
> > If I were you and time *is* an issue, I'd stick with six, since you already
> > have that product sorted out.
> >
> > Philosophically, I disagree with Blue-Sky's super aggressive,
> > market-bug-fixes-as-a-new-relea$e marketing plan. That's one reason I
> > chucked them. But, it's not about philosophy, is it.
> >
> > However, there are plenty of folks out there that like Blue Sky and
> > RoboHelp. To each his own <vbg>.
> >
>
> --
> Tom Huffman
> tlhuffman -at- earthlink -dot- net
> Corel C_Tech Volunteer
>
> From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000==