TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Cost Analysis for FrameMaker From:Cirrus Matusek <CMatusek -at- LTDCOMMODITIES -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 29 Jun 1999 08:25:22 -0500
I agree with Michael Wing. If you value your job, and have even a fraction
of a good attitude, you won't confront your manager with any of what was
suggested. Check out the stc.org site for some good comparisons of
Framemaker.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wing, Michael J [SMTP:mjwing -at- INGR -dot- COM]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 1999 8:17 AM
> To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
> Subject: Re: Cost Analysis for FrameMaker
>
> I'd be very cautious in following this advice as presented. Especially
> since you just moved into the job. The advice is too arrogant and is
> built
> on sand.
>
> I'll wager that pontificating (paraphrased) "that everyone knows that
> FrameMaker is the industry standard, and, therefore I shouldn't have to
> prove anything" will not endear you to your new manager. My guess is that
> your manager wants you to back up your wants and desires with justifiable
> facts. I guess some people just like facts before they make large
> purchases
> and retrain personnel. They're funny that way. The, "everyone knows"
> reply
> is not a fact. It is hearsay. Besides, FrameMaker is a favorite among
> Technical Writers who still produce tree-killing tomes of the printed
> word.
> It in no way dominates or even comes close to a majority of the word
> processing market;^)
>
> Also, taking the "It's not my job" attitude may insure that a Technical
> Writer is all you will ever be. I say, "do get sucked in" and not only
> that, hit a home run.
>
> Faced with this task, I would try the following:
>
> - Check an internet search mechanism for the terms "FrameMaker",
> "PageMaker", and "comparison"
>
> - Visit Adobe's and PageMaker's web sites. They probably have some
> marketing collaterals and white papers with their metrics.
>
> - Check the on-line archives of PCComputing, ZDnet, or some other magazine
> that does product comparisons and ratings.
>
> - Call Adobe and Pagemaker directly and ask if they have metrics.
>
> - If you have a copy of each program, put them on similar machines and
> test
> them one against one another.
>
> Mike
>
> Michael Wing (mailto:mjwing -at- ingr -dot- com)
> Staff Writer/ Web Applications Developer
> Intergraph Corporation; Huntsville, Alabama
>http://maps.intergraph.com
>
>
> > Kari Alt wrote:
> > >Hello,
> > >I just moved into a new Technical Writing job where the TechComm
> > department
> > >uses PageMaker for the majority of their technical user manuals which
> are
> > on
> > >average 100-200 pages long. <snip>
> >
> >
> > I would say that I don't know how to do a serious cost analysis, and
> that
> > that isn't what I was hired to do. And besides, I would tell my
> supervisor
> > that there is plenty of documentation to the fact that FrameMaker is now
> > the
> > industry standard for the kind of work I am doing, and I shouldn't have
> to
> > "prove" anything any more.
> >
> > What your super is asking for would take you hours, if not days to
> > calculate, and would be based almost entirely on APPROXIMATIONS. Don't
> get
> > sucked in.
> >
> > IMHO,
> >
> > Fabien Vais
> >
> > ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
> > Fabien Vais - Documentation Analyst
> > Technical Writing, Technical Translation/Globalization, Editing,
> > Publishing,
> > Teaching, Training
> >
> > e-mail: phantoms -at- total -dot- net
> > Mailing address: 38 Elderidge, Montreal, Quebec, H9A 2P4
> > Phone/Fax: (514) 685-4752
> >
> >
> >
> From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=
> > =
> >
>
>
> From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=
> =
>