TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Anthony Markatos observed that <<A little bit of grammar
knowledge never hurt anyone. Having said that, numerous
studies have concluded that there is no correlation at all
between grammar knowledge and effective technical
communications. In fact, too much grammar knowledge can
actually hinder communication.>>
You couldn't produce actual citations for any of those
"numerous studies" last time you made these indefensible
claims, and I doubt you'll be able to produce them this time
either. In any event, your point obscures the far more
important point: that possessing knowledge and using it
effectively are not always correlated.
Techwhirling tie-in: Anthony's statement does demonstrate,
quite convincingly, that grammatical knowledge alone is
insufficient for effective communication. That's why you
should always insist that your editor or peer reviewer
understands more about communication than just the rules of
grammar. And when you're arranging peer reviews for your
documents, insist on substantive reviews (facts, internal logic,
correctness, and effectiveness of presentation) rather than
solely grammatical ones.
